JNU may not
figure in the list of the best universities in the world, but there can
be little doubt that it is the best in India. The
spread of its academic disciplines, and its influence in Indian
academia and public life, cannot be matched by any other institution in
the country.
This is what was intended by the government when it was established as India’s ‘national university.’
Investment
Some
of its schools, like those of international studies, life sciences,
languages, biotechnology, environmental sciences, and social sciences
are leaders in their respective areas in the country. This reflects the
purpose with which the university was set up, as well as the investment
the country has made.
Of
the tens of thousands who apply, only a handful are admitted, which
makes this an elite institution - just as top universities are around
the world.
Sadly
this is the cause of a great deal of envy and resentment, which is
visible in a lot of uninformed, and even absurd, commentary we have
heard in relation to the allegedly anti-national slogans being heard on
the campus.
The
spread of its student body makes the university unique, because
students come from across the country and from all classes of people
through a deliberate policy of inclusiveness.
Far
from being a den of anti-nationals, JNU is the place where the project
to shape the new Indian identity has been taking shape.
Make no mistake, the real goal of JNU is to promote India’s nationalist project.
Though
we became free in August 1947, Indians today still retain strong local
identities – or language, ethnicity, religion, caste, sub-caste and so
on. But it is the experience of JNU that many of these get broken down.
Not surprisingly, you don’t get reports of North-easterners being
bullied or Dalits being made to stay in their own hostels, as is the
case with some other universities in the country.
The
products of the university are not one-dimensional cardboard cut-outs
like IIT students. JNU has produced generations of teachers, civil
society activists, political leaders, journalists, scholars, diplomats,
executives, writers and poets.
The
best proof of its nation-building role is that the university has given
birth to generations of sensitive and sensitised civil servants who run
key departments of Union and state governments today.
There
is perhaps no university in India which produces more civil servants
for the country than JNU, and this from a student body that is just
about 6,000 today.
The
Modi government’s brightest development star, Amitabh Kant, has a
masters from JNU, as do the chief of the CBI, Anil Sinha, the head of
NTRO, and the Special Envoy for Counter-Terrorism, Asif Ibrahim.
And
of course, batches of Army officers go out with a JNU degree because
the far-sighted military leadership in the 1970s believed that their
institutions needed to be linked to a national project like JNU.
Interaction
In
this process of being the new Indian, it is important to learn about
India as well. It is only through interaction with people from the
North-east, Jharkhand, Bihar, Tamil Nadu, Andhra, Telangana, Odisha and
other states that we really understand their concerns and problems.
In
the India of today, there is regional exploitation, economic
backwardness, caste repression, violation of tribal rights - and there
is resistance to this, and so this is reflected in the narrative of
JNU’s student politics.
The
country also confronts separatism, whether in the North-east, Punjab,
or Jammu & Kashmir, and this, too, figures in the JNU story.
To
the best of this writer’s knowledge, however, this discourse has
remained verbal and no alumni has actually gone and taken up a gun to
overthrow the state.
Identity
The
persistence of separatism and deep roots of caste and regional
prejudice are an indicator that the “new Indian” project remains a work
in progress. But instead of using the lathi to shape the new Indian, it
is so much smarter to help him/ her emerge through the process of
debate, discussion and engagement, a process whose corollary is the
acceptance of dissent.
JNU
is the small lab where the new Indian identity is being forged.
Attacking it for being “anti-national” is actually aimed at undermining
the project and destroying the best university we have on the basis of
some dubious pseudo-nationalism.
There
is good nationalism and bad nationalism. Japan rampaging across Asia in
the 1930s was the negative; getting an ethnically and linguistically
diverse India to fight against British rule was the positive kind.
Indian
nationalism of desh bhakti today cannot be directed against ‘the other’
as Pakistan’s religion based nationalism is. It can have only one goal -
the economic transformation of India and the true equality of all its
people.
Our
nationalism will become a bad thing if it promotes resentment against
people who look different, eat differently, profess a different faith,
or have different views.
Chauvinism and jingoism can only lead to disaster, as in the case of Germany and Japan in 1945, or the case of Pakistan today.
The writer is a JNU alumnus, but also has degrees from DU and Lucknow University
No comments:
Post a Comment